(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
You'd have some amount of fouling outside the arc then.
Seanfan (Roscommon) - Posts: 32 - 01/08/2025 11:43:44 2629636 Link 0 |
It's a no brainer. Must keep as it's contributed to the openess and skill of long range shooting that was otherwise lacking. Can't change it for frees as you rightly pointed out, there would be cynical play outside arc then. Wouldn't up the 3pt goal either. They need to do something about the handpassing which i think they are looking at. The other thing which people are talking about Kerry running down the time with the shot clock. This argument doesn't stack up, Donegal chose not to engage and Kerry were still looking to score. It's was just a terrible lack of judgement from Donegal. Donegal were rightly punished. If Kerry just played keep ball and went into their own half before kicking it out, it would be a different story. The FRC are looking at that one and the way Louth went at it at end of Leinster final. winatallcost (Meath) - Posts: 773 - 01/08/2025 12:04:59 2629639 Link 0 |
I would keep it but increase goal to four Yadse (Limerick) - Posts: 173 - 01/08/2025 12:52:05 2629643 Link 0 |
Frees shouldn't be allowed to be brought out for 2 pointers if the foul is committed inside, but apart from that, I would be in favour of keeping the 2 pointers. Commodore (Donegal) - Posts: 1452 - 01/08/2025 13:17:08 2629648 Link 0 |
Keep the rule. It's contributed hugely to the game. Skill such as David Clifford's and Rory Beggan's should be rewarded. Greengrass (Louth) - Posts: 6192 - 01/08/2025 13:29:18 2629650 Link 0 |
I'd keep the 2 point. One rule I'd add is if the attack brings the ball inside the arc they cannot pass it back outside it again. boxtyburgerbuns (Leitrim) - Posts: 518 - 01/08/2025 13:56:00 2629656 Link 0 |
A couple of points, being allowed to take the ball outside the arch for a two pointer, no. Bring the arch out to the 50, at the minute these are tap over two pointers for men coming on the loop. No two pointers from frees, Whatever they bring in or change it's the same rule for all teams and at the minute it was Kerry who mastered them. Saynothing (Tyrone) - Posts: 2396 - 01/08/2025 13:57:38 2629657 Link 1 |
yeas keep the 2 point rule. I think its early days yet and teams will get better at taking the opportunities. I'd be in favor of brining it out to the 50 as it would negate the short kickout aswell (which isn't a real problem any more). ponger (Cavan) - Posts: 595 - 01/08/2025 15:01:15 2629662 Link 0 |
That isn't allowed under the current rules.
benjyyy (Donegal) - Posts: 1446 - 01/08/2025 15:20:48 2629663 Link 1 |
I have started watching football after 20 years. Growing up in a football parish and a dad who excelled by any standards in the sport. It is much better but not quite there yet. Canuck (Waterford) - Posts: 3157 - 01/08/2025 15:39:10 2629665 Link 0 |
Keep but only from play. No way in hell frees should be worth 2 eddieSize5Balls (Donegal) - Posts: 227 - 01/08/2025 15:54:15 2629669 Link 0 |
2 points should stand regardless of another player getting a touch on the ball. It's such a dumb rule suckvalleypaddy (Galway) - Posts: 1762 - 01/08/2025 16:01:09 2629671 Link 0 |
Reward fouling? No!! Seanfan (Roscommon) - Posts: 32 - 01/08/2025 16:22:15 2629677 Link 0 |
I like the "forward" free & sideline kick. Your arc restriction might be too much when it's crowded inside - my alternative is once 'inside the 45' allow the ball out ONCE to between 45-65 (not back behind 65). Also, when between 45s (and can't play back behind 45), time limit of 20 seconds - ref 'unscientifically' calls "use it" at this point, and team has 10 more seconds to play ball forward to inside 45, or concede a free at midfield. omahant (USA) - Posts: 3326 - 01/08/2025 16:25:57 2629680 Link 0 |
The All Ireland final was noticeable for its lack of physical contact. tirawleybaron (Mayo) - Posts: 1540 - 01/08/2025 17:45:03 2629694 Link 1 |
4.When time is up the hooter goes no matter where the ball is. Watching players with 5 minutes to go to half time or full time playing soccer with it. The supporters come to see a full game not time wasting. Canuck (Waterford) I totally agree. The "hooter" was adopted based on the system in New York for approx. 70 years. The play is over as soon as it sounds, unless the ball has been played before it sounds and directly results in a score, in which case the score stands. Gaa Fan (USA) - Posts: 764 - 01/08/2025 18:37:40 2629698 Link 0 |
That's nonsense, there would never be a 2 pointer, just constant fouling to prevent them.
Longtimefirsttime (Wexford) - Posts: 6 - 01/08/2025 18:50:56 2629701 Link 0 |
Get rid. Should be 4 points for a goal. endgame (Roscommon) - Posts: 2567 - 01/08/2025 20:15:13 2629705 Link 0 |
I dont think it's rewarding fouling. You still get an unpressured shot at goal if you want to take it. It might not be perfect but in my opinion its better than an unpressured kick for 2 points due to an innocuous foul.
benjyyy (Donegal) - Posts: 1446 - 01/08/2025 21:24:42 2629710 Link 0 |
I really dont think constantly giving away frees on the 2 point line would be a winning strategy even for 1 point scores.
benjyyy (Donegal) - Posts: 1446 - 01/08/2025 21:27:30 2629711 Link 0 |