(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Outdoor basketball without a shot clock though, which is where most of the boredom can set in imo. I'm sure traditionalists aren't at all pleasured either by these horrible 2or3 minute keepball routines to run down the end of game clock past the 'hooter'. Must have a sort of death row feel those last few minutes for losing fans, compared to the excitement of waiting for the final whistle back in the harum scarum days, when lads weren't drilled to death on the value and understanding of possession.
Pope_Benedict (Galway) - Posts: 4141 - 13/05/2025 11:53:01 2609155 Link 0 |
You are totally correct.. All these new rugger rules have totally diluted the game… 'tap and go'… kicking the ball out to end the game and passing the ball back outside the big circle for a rugger type drop at goal to gain 2 points and don't get me started on handing the ball back to your opponent who can then tap and go… run straight into you and away goes the referee with the ball under his arm for 50 meters…!!! I fully can understand that something had to be done to improve the total dross we had for years but this numpty FRC have gone way too far with their changes….less is always better as they say
ForeverBlue2 (Cavan) - Posts: 3856 - 13/05/2025 13:16:03 2609202 Link 0 |
I don't know one person who has a problem with the new clock system . Not one player or coach. Why do we always care so much for the lads on the couch who are never happy anyway.
TheFlaker (Mayo) - Posts: 8385 - 13/05/2025 16:45:25 2609295 Link 2 |
I don't agree. It makes for very exciting and tense finishes and it means everyone knows when the end is and it's not dependent on the whim of a referee. There is great skill and risk in maintaining possession like that and it's the job of the losing team to take the risk themselves and push up and press. Louth's final point on Sunday was a fine example of a team using a period of possession to engineer an excellent score.
CeachtPeile (Cavan) - Posts: 137 - 13/05/2025 18:43:29 2609332 Link 0 |
I think the FRC has done an excellent job. The clampdown on dissent has been a great success and when you see how much dissent there now is in hurling, the same approach should be adopted there. I am not a particular fan of the 2-point score but I think it's probably here to stay. But I strongly think the goal needs to go back to 4 points, as was originally planned, to maintain its relative value. It was an unnecessarily panicked move to change it back to 3 after the interprovincials. I do think there's an argument for making the goal be worth 4 points in both football and hurling. The ease and speed with which long range points can be scored by the top players in hurling has devalued the worth of a goal. It might be better to do that simultaneously for both and avoid any confusion by having different values in the two sports. CeachtPeile (Cavan) - Posts: 137 - 13/05/2025 18:45:32 2609334 Link 0 |
What has the 2 point rule brought to the game..? Nothing only now for people wanting goals worth 4 points… such utter nonsense… Revert to points been worth 1… and just leave the goals alone.. The nonsense about the goalkeeper getting a touch to the ball to reduce it to 1 point even if it was kicked from well outside the arc just makes a mockery of the whole thing… The FRC have not done an excellent job.. they went way over the top with half of these nonsensical rules…
ForeverBlue2 (Cavan) - Posts: 3856 - 13/05/2025 22:27:08 2609392 Link 0 |