(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
What would people think of allowing 3 video reviews per match? StoreysTash (Wexford) - Posts: 1726 - 04/06/2021 16:29:37 2348241 Link 2 |
Are you crazy? 3 per team is 6 stoppages for at least 1min every match. It would completely ruin the flow of the game, One could have a review just to slow the game down! skirge7 (UK) - Posts: 245 - 04/06/2021 19:40:25 2348269 Link 1 |
That could be a recipe for disaster, its hard enough for officials to officiate games as they are, teams could take the total mick out of it to break momentum and slow things down. Bon (Kildare) - Posts: 1893 - 04/06/2021 20:38:33 2348279 Link 0 |
So you want to slow it down even more? Are you suggesting that a successful challenge means that you still have 3 challenges even if you use 1 successfully? This idea well intentioned as it is should be a non starter.
Greengrass (Louth) - Posts: 6029 - 04/06/2021 21:59:50 2348311 Link 0 |
Why do we need all this video evidence nonsense if we have already got 7 pairs of eyes trained on the players at all times..? Are these 7 deemed numpty's or completely blind or what.....? All 7 officials for inter county games should be trained referees and not the referees best mate he might have dragged out of the pub from the night before...!!! ForeverBlue2 (Cavan) - Posts: 1820 - 05/06/2021 08:37:00 2348349 Link 0 |
Of the 7 pairs of eyes, it seems 6 of them are not able to decide anything. StoreysTash (Wexford) - Posts: 1726 - 05/06/2021 13:14:35 2348398 Link 0 |
Exactly right - don't listen to the dinosaurs. Nothing wrong with the eyesight of linemen and umpires, they just lack courage. Culture of kow-towing to refs. Contrast rugby where ref explains what he's doing; in our games, it's all high and mighty sign language with no explanations and you're a villain if you ask for an explanation for a crackers decision. 3 challenges, heck, Veen 2 challenges, max - whether successful or not, couple of challenges would sort out a lot of the horrible and unfair decisions such as that Meath "goal" v Louth a few years ago. Isn't it odd how "keeping the game moving" is far more important than fairness and the right result. If some of these posters were judges, they'd have people running through the courtroom to keep things moving and deciding cases with a flip of a coin. Might be a few people in jail wrongly, but hey the process would be v efficient lol essmac (Tyrone) - Posts: 1141 - 05/06/2021 13:42:38 2348403 Link 1 |
This not Premier League soccer Who is going to pay for all this? Cameras and all the technology required for this would need to be at every game, whether they are being shown on TV or not. You can't have video reviews at some games, and not at others.
Cockney_Cat (UK) - Posts: 2419 - 05/06/2021 13:56:37 2348406 Link 1 |
The problem isn't the technology, it's the clowns monitoring it.
AfricanGael (UK) - Posts: 1947 - 05/06/2021 14:07:41 2348410 Link 1 |
carlovia (None) - Posts: 1517 - 05/06/2021 14:37:39 2348416 Link 1 |
Nah. You're clutching at straws. It's a non runner.
Greengrass (Louth) - Posts: 6029 - 05/06/2021 17:27:13 2348460 Link 1 |
Yeah definitely. No reason not to have video refs at games where there are cameras already there. Would cut out some daft decisions such as when Meath won Leinster in 2010. Decisions against my own county might be Dublin player picking ball off the ground in scoring distance at the very end of 2016 AI draw, or Bernard Brogan throwing the ball for someone to palm in in 2015 replay, there's probably a host of decisions that went against Mayo down in Limerick in 2014. I'm sure everyone can remember a few big game turning moments that went against their county, maybe not too many for lol. You wouldn't even need to give teams a certain amount of challenges. Just have video refs looking at the game and they can flag whatever with the ref with a mic. jonjon (Mayo) - Posts: 99 - 05/06/2021 18:26:13 2348473 Link 0 |
So you reckon Joe Sheridan's goal v Louth in that Leinster Final should not have been challenged? I know nothing about Louth but I would suspect a video review could have changed the course of football in Louth? By the time that ref ran in to the umpire, he could have got the TMO to check. StoreysTash (Wexford) - Posts: 1726 - 05/06/2021 21:49:34 2348532 Link 0 |
Oh come off it, I'm not saying have 10 cameras at every match. I'm saying for inter county matches, where there is a minimum of 4 cameras probably, check whatever is available. It would cost hardly anything. If none of them show anything to contradict the decision, on the game goes. StoreysTash (Wexford) - Posts: 1726 - 05/06/2021 21:51:27 2348534 Link 0 |
so one system for a galway v limerick game different one for a louth v leitrim game? good luck with that one
Stmunnsriver (Wexford) - Posts: 2823 - 05/06/2021 22:36:30 2348554 Link 0 |
so one system for a galway v limerick game different one for a louth v leitrim game? good luck with that one
Stmunnsriver (Wexford) - Posts: 2823 - 05/06/2021 22:36:30 2348555 Link 1 |
4 cameras will pick up very little and not making it near worthwhile
KillingFields (Limerick) - Posts: 3480 - 06/06/2021 00:21:27 2348572 Link 1 |
2 challenges per game. No extra video ref is needed. Just the game ref going to the sideline and having a look. It would cut out the extra video ref which blights VAR. Very similar to American football. bloodyban (Limerick) - Posts: 1710 - 06/06/2021 07:42:45 2348576 Link 0 |
Let's be honest here, the Paparazzi wouldn't get a look in that day, there was more recordings of Big Joe's Goal than there was of Trump leaving the white house for the last time. Wasn't Big Joes nose touching the umpires boot as the ball crossed the line, what more evidence does anyone want, - it wasn't for lack of evidence or camera work that the goal should have been disallowed, rather was it lack of fair play action from Croke Park officials at the highest level. supersub15 (Carlow) - Posts: 2904 - 06/06/2021 10:43:34 2348596 Link 0 |
Who provides the cameras?
Greengrass (Louth) - Posts: 6029 - 06/06/2021 10:53:38 2348598 Link 0 |