(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
We need a referee and we need to make his job simpler so less mistakes are made in big games.
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 16029 - 02/06/2021 13:14:31 2347684 Link 0 |
And his own Waterford seemingly....
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 16029 - 02/06/2021 13:17:03 2347685 Link 0 |
'' Allow minimal contact that last less than a second'' Jesus Wept...part 3... bennybunny (Cork) - Posts: 3917 - 02/06/2021 14:27:06 2347715 Link 0 |
For me, this year, yes. Just my opinion.
Flakeaway (Tipperary) - Posts: 14 - 02/06/2021 15:03:40 2347723 Link 1 |
I will repeat it it this week. Shoulder to the chest with elbows down, feet on the ground and both hands on the hurley. Taking a run at a player to execute the tackle a free. Any day in preference to wrapping around the neck.
Canuck (Waterford) - Posts: 3072 - 02/06/2021 15:17:49 2347727 Link 0 |
Ludo is a great game. Minimum contact. Only when handing the dice over.
Canuck (Waterford) - Posts: 3072 - 02/06/2021 15:22:09 2347728 Link 0 |
My point is in relation to the use of a designated sweeper. If you take to the field with a negative mindset, you are going nowhere. A designated sweeper to me is a signal to the opposition you fear them. Galway only started playing with a spare man last year. Every other game in 16. 17 and 18, thy reacted to what the opposition did. If the opposition played a 7th defender you automatically have a spare man. You either play him as a 7th attacker ( but clog your forwards) or play him in midfield or defence. Galway played a sweeper in 18 v Clare only after Galvin went back cos Clare FB line was getting wiped. Donoghue didnt play a spare man, it came under O Neill. Any time they did was reactionary. Limerick play a totally different game to say Wexford, McGraths Waterford or Davys Clare...i.e. they track back as a group but always leave enough firepower up the field. Sweepers wont win you an All Ireland. Wexford dont score enough. Clare 14-16 put up some very bad scores against the top sides. Waterford same under McGrath. Flakeaway (Tipperary) - Posts: 14 - 02/06/2021 15:27:27 2347730 Link 1 |
Sure we ll swap the sliotar for a tiddly wink and the hurls for straws and play the game as non contact altogether in a ball alley with a roof so noone gets their shirt pulled or wet either!
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 16029 - 02/06/2021 15:42:18 2347733 Link 0 |
Sure we ll swap the sliotar for a tiddly wink and the hurls for straws and play the game as non contact altogether in a ball alley with a roof so noone gets their shirt pulled or wet either!
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 16029 - 02/06/2021 15:43:12 2347735 Link 0 |
Good one Canuck!
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 16029 - 02/06/2021 15:55:49 2347740 Link 0 |
Galway played with Tuohy, I think it was from memory, as a spare man or sweeper or whatever you want to call him when they beat you in the 2017 AISF. We scored 3-20 against you in the semi in 2019, which score wouldve won all but 2 of the games in last years AI championship.
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 16029 - 02/06/2021 16:04:56 2347745 Link 0 |
We need to have some fun
Canuck (Waterford) - Posts: 3072 - 02/06/2021 16:08:32 2347746 Link 0 |
You see it from a different perspective than me obviously. I come from the point of view that if you keep blowing the whistle for these kind of fouls then they will eventually stop fouling and the game will then be more free flowing. You on the other hand want the refs to ignore the fouls to keep the game flowing. The problem with your version is there is no written rule. Its all grey areas. How do you write into the rule book that a player can pull a player 'a small bit' before it becomes a foul. Rules are back and white and its either a foul or it isnt. Im all for a bit of leniency around the spare hand but to refer back to the Wexford v KK game that you didn't even watch, the spare hand foul was responsible for 90% of the fouls in that game. Thats not a grey area thats just pure muck.
ZUL10 (Clare) - Posts: 708 - 02/06/2021 16:36:42 2347757 Link 0 |
I watched all of it live and wouldve been there if I'd of been let in Zulu. You are confusing me with another poster. You are right it was responsible for most of TJs 14 points from frees but it shouldn't have been. I'm only saying that a small bit of shirt pulling or spare hand pulling should be let be in the rules so that these arent grey areas. And then there would be no incentive for players to dive on the ground or throw their arm or hurl backwards at the least contact looking for frees. So then there would be less frees blown up for and a more free flowing game.
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 16029 - 02/06/2021 16:56:12 2347764 Link 0 |
For sure!
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 16029 - 02/06/2021 16:56:32 2347765 Link 0 |
Rules are black and white because if not they will be exploited. We love the grey areas because it can get our man away with a foul but none of that now when the opposition do it. Managers jumping up and down on the line doing a jig. How about giving the ref some help.It is a job for two but I will admit that takes a lot of training. For now he has an ear piece. The video ref tells him number 13 has pulled back before. Yellow card followed by red if repeated. If the ref feels he is having to call an excessive amount of frees for dragging let the teams know he is going to pick one or maybe two of these infractions and red card someone. Don't care if it is two from the same team. Believe me it works because now they know the consequences and not playing him. This will never happen of course because the poor ref would be lynched saying he spoiled the game. When in fact it was the players who spoiled the game and managers should show some back bone and tell them so.
Canuck (Waterford) - Posts: 3072 - 02/06/2021 23:43:57 2347867 Link 1 |
Coaches like Fitzy, McGrath, Donal Og, etc I think have totally overdone it on the sweeper, short passing and defensive stuff. It cost Wexford an All Ireland in 2019 in my opinion. A man up, yet they retreated back the field. StoreysTash (Wexford) - Posts: 1845 - 03/06/2021 10:36:04 2347918 Link 1 |
Its an unpoliceable rule. A referee cannot determine whether a player has elbows down and both feet on the ground. That is just impossible to expect. And in addition, if a player is coming running, even hitting a static player full frontal is a cruncher. And in addition, no player is going to be static like you suggest - it is a hurling match not schoolyard "stuck in the mud". StoreysTash (Wexford) - Posts: 1845 - 03/06/2021 10:38:06 2347919 Link 0 |
We will have other chances Storeystash.
Viking66 (Wexford) - Posts: 16029 - 03/06/2021 11:24:14 2347932 Link 0 |
Disagree. It is charging if you run at a player and hit him. Even in hockey that has a frontal hit that is called all the time. If the player is injured you are going to get a major suspension. Talk about static. You just described the rucks perfectly a school yard "stuck in the muck " melee. No moment of any source only free hands all over the place and scrambling for the ball like chickens for a grain of food. The ref policing. First of all give hime some support. The ref has a 90% better chance of determining if the elbows are used compared of his chances of knowing if the ball was thrown. Zero tolerance for the free hands near another player. The use of a legal hit to dispossess a player. Sending off for continuous fouling. These few things will reduce frees significantly and a hurling match will break out. A little pain at first for some long term gain. Canuck (Waterford) - Posts: 3072 - 03/06/2021 15:26:19 2348001 Link 0 |